Cold War

Show Info 2-04-2015 – News, Guest James Perloff

Show Info 2-04-2015 – News, Guest James Perloff

Show Info 2-04-2015 – News, Guest James Perloff

February 04

News and Guests


Second Hour Guest

James PerloffIn the second hour JD is joined by author and historian James Perloff for a discussion about his research into the demise of the cold war and the birth of the war on terror through the eyes of history and the key players responsible for the development of both of these global conflicts.

Jim “Scruffy” Perloff flunked out of East Squantum Community College in his freshman year. He has been named “Mr. Dweeb” seven years running. He was awarded the Booby Prize for inventing a fire alarm with a snooze button. He is banned from using the Internet at his local public library. He is the Least Interesting Man in the World — he doesn’t always drink beer, but when he does, he drinks East Squantum Light (don’t stay thirsty, my friends). He paid $200 for a fake Michael Jordan autograph on a pair of used BVDs. He was blown away in a chess game by his pet hamster, Twinky. A dozen Tea Party members renounced conservatism after a 2-minute conversation with him. When Mother Teresa saw him lying in a ditch, she told the other sisters, “Leave him there — the buzzards might need something to eat.” He is author of the book How to Wallpaper your House with Rejections Slips from Publishers. He also split his pants and, at age 45, was defeated in a battle of wits with a fire hydrant.

James investigates the global elites agenda to create a new world order through their use of media manipulation, false flag narratives and fictional humanitarian crisis. He uses historical reflection to show that these tactics of control have been used to foment war.
Full Bio:

Articles: Did the Cold War End So that the War on Terror Could Begin?, The American Revolution, Part I: The Secrets Buried at Lexington Green, A Century of Mainstream Media Lies, Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt’s 9/11.
Books: Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, The Shadows of Power, and Tornado in a Junkyard.

Listen to the Broadcast

Truth Frequency Radio. Call in to listen 832-225-5308 or click the “Listen Live” banner in the right side bar.

Download here after the show

First Hour News with JD

World News

USA considers supplying lethal weapons to Ukraine

Head of UN war crimes inquiry resigns after Israeli allegations of bias

Greece to reject EU-US trade deal

Domestic MasterCard: 5 Russian banks begin new National Payment System

3 soldiers attacked outside Jewish center in Nice, France

ISIS burns alive Jordanian pilot it kept hostage – reports

Jordan vows ‘revenge’ for ISIS execution of pilot hostage

Canadian Rail Terror Plot Exposed

US News

White House lockdown over unattended package ends

Audit: Post Office Workers ‘Rude’ and ‘Worse than Other Retailers’

Gunmen rob Schnucks supermarket in Creve Coeur

UPDATE: Ohio Murder, W.Va. Robbery Suspect Could be Headed to Florida

Plutonium fears hex planned prescribed fires at Rocky Flats wildlife refuge

Obama Wants More Money for Military Spy Satellites, Lasers, Space Fence

Senator says maybe restaurants shouldn’t make employees wash their hands

Obama to announce new NSA data collection rules


Economic News

OPEC leader: Oil could shoot back to $200

Microsoft Accepting Bitcoin in UK, Reportedly

Wednesday to witness holding 1st International Investment Conference in Baghdad [02/03/2015]

Fossil Free Indexes Outperformed S&P 500 By 1.5% In 2014

The $100 Trillion Global Debt Ponzi Scheme

Fed Could Surprise Markets With Premature Rate Hike In 2015 – Blackstone



S&P faces new $125mn fine – report

Greek stocks rise after new cabinet offers ‘smart debt engineering’

Science & Technology

Step Aside WikiLeaks, Darkleaks Helps Hackers Share Crime with Bitcoin Technology

FCC will attempt to regulate ISPs as utilities, report says

Scientists will try to reawaken Rosetta’s lander as Comet 67P approaches the Sun

BYD C9 — First 200 Mile Electric Bus Unveiled

Solar & Wind = 53% Of New US Electricity Capacity In 2014

Subglacial Lake Vostok cracked for a second time|NSNS|2012-GLOBAL|online-news



New ‘Solar Cloth’ Material Creates Solar Energy Pretty Much Anywhere!

UK Launches Massive Propaganda Campaign

Health News

Is your lymphatic system healthy? Fix your lymphs, fix your body

NJ Gov. Says Parents Should Have a Right to Accept or Deny Vaccinations for Kids

Measles used by government & mockingbird media to shame parents, mandate vaccinations

Chipotle founder said McDonald’s chicken farm was the most disgusting thing he’d ever seen

GNC, Wal-Mart, other retailers deceptively labeling herbal supplements – report

Energy & Environment

Only 8 Big Cities in China Meet Air Quality Requirements

Japan & U.S. Gov’t Experts: West Coast hit by radioactive plumes from both massive Fukushima explosions

Home, Farm & Garden

Twenty-eight benefits to prepping even if TEOTWAWKI doesn’t come

Blossom-End Rot: Prevention and Treatment

Using Honey to Make Mead

Housing News

DBRS: Housing sales will pick up in 2015

DOJ shifts focus to Moody’s Investors Service

JPMorgan settles Bear Stearns’ lawsuit, pays $500 million

Weird, Funny & Good News

Attempt to pay property taxes in $1 bills lands Texas man in in jail

Groundhog bites Wisconsin mayor’s ear during ceremony

Cannabis Is Making Colorado So Much Money They Literally Have To Give Some Back To Residents

Featured Video

THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take?

Posted by Red Pill Reports in 2015 Shows, Jan.-Mar., Shows
Did the Cold War End So that the War on Terror Could Begin?

Did the Cold War End So that the War on Terror Could Begin?

Did the Cold War End So that the War on Terror Could Begin?

By James Perloff | Red Pill Reports

In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in the Soviet Union. This marked the beginning of glasnost and the end of the Cold War. Communism, we were soon told, was no longer a threat.

Did the Cold War End So that the War on Terror Could Begin?

Portrait Of Ronald Reagan & Mikhail Gorbachev


Many of us regarded the mysterious transition with skepticism. Why would communism, which had slain some 100 million people1 during is ruthless conquest of half the planet, suddenly don a smiley-face, introduce freedoms, and abandon its sworn goal of world domination?

Mainstream media alleged the Soviet Union fell apart because, under Ronald Reagan, the U.S. successfully tested an anti-ballistic missile, demonstrating our capacity to put up the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). If implemented, this system, nicknamed “Star Wars,” could have repelled a missile attack. The USSR allegedly collapsed because it couldn’t meet the cost of competing with SDI.

This explanation didn’t hold much water, however. As I document in Truth Is a Lonely Warrior (pp. 113-15), by 1985 the Soviet had achieved a decisive lead over the United States in virtually every category of nuclear and conventional weapon. Furthermore, Congress, then controlled by Ted Kennedy and the Democrats, vigorously opposed SDI. They were only willing to fund research, not deployment. Why would the Soviets cave in over such an improbable threat?

New Lies for OldSkepticism was bolstered by discovery of Anatoliy Golitsyn’s remarkable book New Lies for Old. Golitsyn, the highest-ranking KGB officer to defect during the Cold War, had predicted glasnost with stunning accuracy five years before it started. He forecast everything from the rise of a Gorbachev-like leader to the fall of the Berlin Wall. Furthermore, he stated that the liberalization would only be a temporary deception. Ultimately, he said, “all the totalitarian features familiar from the early stages of the Soviet revolution and the postwar Stalinist years in Eastern Europe might be expected to reappear.”2

Nevertheless, over time it became clear that the changes to communist nations were more genuine and durable than skeptics had anticipated. For example, although China remains statist, its economy has undeniably been overhauled and significantly Westernized since the days of Mao Tse-Tung’s Cultural Revolution.

However, with the disappearance of Communism as “the enemy,” a new one almost immediately emerged: Islamic terrorist threats. In 1985, Gorbachev came to power. Just one year later, 1986, Reagan launched air strikes on Libya, the first round in what would be a growing, never-ending conflict with the Muslim states of MENA (Middle East and North Africa).

In 1991, the Soviet Union dissolved into 15 republics. That same year, Reagan’s successor, George H. W. Bush, oversaw the First Gulf War, America’s first land war in the Middle East. Since 9/11, the United States has been involved in so many wars, in so many Middle East regions, that they’ve become hard to keep track of.

Nearly all Truthers today know that 9-11 was a false flag. What is less widely known is that Reagan’s air strikes on Libya were also predicated on a false flag.

In 1986, U.S. soldiers were frequenting a Berlin discotheque called La Belle. On April 5, a bomb tore through it, killing two American servicemen and wounding well over 50 others. U.S. intelligence then intercepted radio messages, originating in Libya, that congratulated alleged perpetrators of the crime. President Reagan sent bombers which struck Libya. The adopted daughter of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was killed in those raids. This was the first blood drawn in what the Reagan administration then called “war against terrorism,” meaning that America would punish not just terrorists, but any nation it believed guilty of sponsoring terrorism. (Based on this definition, the United States could have declared war on Israel several times, going back to the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, if we define that incident as terrorism.)

La BelleOstrovsky
Victor Ostrovsky is a former agent of the Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service. In his book The Other Side of Deception, Ostrovsky revealed that the Mossad originated the radio signals from Libya, completely deceiving U.S. intelligence:

A Trojan was a special communication device that could be planted by naval commandos deep inside enemy territory. The device would act as a relay station for misleading transmissions made by the disinformation unit in the Mossad, called LAP [LohAma Psicologit – psychological warfare], and intended to be received by American and British listening stations. Originating from an IDF navy ship out at sea, the prerecorded digital transmissions could be picked up only by the Trojan. The device would then rebroadcast the transmission on another frequency, one used for official business in the enemy country, at which point the transmission would finally be picked up by American ears in Britain.

The listeners would have no doubt they had intercepted a genuine communication, hence the name Trojan, reminiscent of the mythical Trojan horse. Further, the content of the messages, once deciphered, would confirm information from other intelligence sources, namely the Mossad. The only catch was that the Trojan itself would have to be located as close as possible to the normal origin of such transmissions, because of the sophisticated methods of triangulation the Americans and others would use to verify the source.3

After detailing how the Mossad succeeded in planting a Trojan in a Tripoli apartment in 1986, Ostrovsky describes the results:

By the end of March, the Americans were already intercepting messages broadcast by the Trojan, which was only activated during heavy communication traffic hours. Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world . . . . As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What’s more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it. . . .

Heads of the Mossad were counting on the American promise to retaliate with vengeance against any country that could be proven to support terrorism. The Trojan gave the Americans the proof they needed. . . .

Ultimately, the Americans fell for the Mossad ploy head over heels, dragging the British and the Germans somewhat reluctantly in with them. Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad’s greatest successes. It brought about the air strike on Libya that President Reagan had promised . . . . 4

Glaspie meets Hussein

Likewise, the 1991 Gulf War was contrived though deceptions. First, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie deceived Saddam Hussein by assuring him that the United States was indifferent to his conflict with Kuwait. Glaspie has been muzzled ever since. And when polls showed the American public divided on the prospect of the war, a story was fabricated about Iraqi soldiers throwing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators:

Each of America’s Middle East wars has been based on false pretexts. The 14-year-old war on Afghanistan was predicated on 9/11, the false flag which spurred the nationwide Truth Movement, populated by responsible groups such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

The War in Iraq was based on falsified claims that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. Colin Powell, Bush’s Secretary of State, who made such definite assertions of WMDs before the UN, has admitted his claims were based on faulty intelligence. Well before the UN speech, Scott Ritter, the UN’s chief weapons inspector in Iraq, had confirmed that Saddam had no WMDs:

Perhaps most pathetic was George Bush joking about the missing WMDs while American soldiers were dying in Iraq:

Watch Reg Keys, father of a serviceman who died in Iraq, take down Tony Blair for misleading Britons on this matter:

In 2011, NATO attacked Libya on the pretext of supporting a “popular democratic uprising against a dictator.”

Libya bombing

In fact, Gaddafi had turned Libya into the most prosperous nation in MENA, and had proposed a gold-backed currency for Africa, which was apparently the last straw for the banksters. The “popular uprising” consisted largely of mercenaries sent in by foreign intelligence services. For truth about Libya, I suggest this short article and this one, and the following video:

In 2013, it was Assad’s turn to get hit. The U.S. government claimed the Syrian leader had used chemical weapons on his own people. This seemed unbelievable since UN weapons inspectors had just arrived in Syria at Assad’s invitation. Many believed it was the Western-backed insurgents themselves who wielded the weapons as a yet another “false flag,” a view thought credible by Ron PaulPat Buchanan, and other responsible observers. Obama was unable to procure support for air strikes on Syria from a war-weary American public.

So it was back to the drawing board. In 2014, in a brazen paradox, the Obama administration sought air strikes on Syria again – this time not against Assad, but upon the very “rebels” the U.S. had backed the year before! Uploaded beheading videos proved more effective in garnering support than the previous year’s “chemical weapons” dud.

Watch as General Wesley Clark reveals that in 2001, a plan already existed in the Pentagon to “take out” seven MENA nations, including Iraq, Libya and Syria:


These same intentions were discussed by syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan (above), who was the Reform Party’s Presidential candidate in 2000. He wrote in 2004:

In 1996, in a strategy paper crafted for Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser urged him to “focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power” as an “Israeli strategic objective.” Perle, Feith, Wurmser were all on Bush’s foreign policy team on 9-11.

In 1998, eight members of Bush’s future team, including Perle, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, wrote President Clinton urging upon him a strategy that “should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein.”

On Jan. 1, 2001, nine months before 9-11, Wurmser called for U.S.-Israeli attacks “to broaden the [Middle East] conflict to strike fatally . . . the regimes of Damascus, Baghdad, Tripoli, Teheran and Gaza . . . to establish the recognition that fighting with either the United States or Israel is suicidal.”

“Crises can be opportunities,” added Wurmser.

On Sept. 11, opportunity struck.5

Clearly, an entrenched plan already existed, long ago, to attack the nations of the Middle East. To justify each of these attacks in the public’s view, false flags would be necessary. Thus 9/11, “weapons of mass destruction,” “chemical weapons attacks,” viral beheading videos, and, yes, the Charlie Hebdo incident:

What has all this to do with glasnost? As many students of realpolitik know, the Bolshevik Revolution, which created the Soviet Union, was financed by the same Rothschild-centered banking cabal that runs our world today. This support continued even during the Cold War through trade, financing, and technology transfers.  I will not elaborate all the details here, but for those who wish to learn more, see my article on this blog, chapter 9 of Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, and such books as Juri Lina’s Under the Sign of the Scorpion (now available in an updated 2014 edition), Antony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, and Joseph Finder’s Red Carpet. What the banksters turned on, they could also turn off.

As many students of realpolitik also know, the cabal has supported a three-headed hydra of “isms”: globalism, communism and Zionism. Globalism expresses their ultimate goal of a tyrannical world government; communism, posing as a movement of “the people,” used revolution to overthrow governments to make way for that world government; and Zionism is the plot to create the seat of this government in Jerusalem – a city holy to Jews, Christians and Muslims alike. Need I mention that this plot is satanic?

Given the degree of design and planning that has gone into all of this, I make a radical suggestion: that the timing of the ostensible end of communism, coinciding with the beginning of America’s “war on terror,” was not by chance. Communism was being given a back seat to Zionism. To throw the entire weight of the American military machine against all of Israel’s enemies in the Middle East, Americans had to be persuaded that the threat of communism no longer existed. This, I believe, is the most probable solution to the riddle of glasnost.


  1. Stéphane Courtois et al., The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), 4.
  2. Anatoliy Golitsyn, New Lies for Old (New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1984), 347.
  3. Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception: A Rogue Agent Exposes the Mossad’s Secret Agenda (New York: HarperPaperbacks, 1994), 143-44.
  4. Ibid., 146-48.
  5. Patrick J. Buchanan, “Have the Neocons Killed a Presidency?” WorldNetDaily, February 16, 2004,
Posted by Red Pill Reports in Learn, War